Τhe Culture-Borders-Gender/Lab co-organizes with the Association of Social Anthropologists of Greece, the Department of Modern and Contemporary History and Social Anthropology of the Department of History and Archaeology of the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, the Athens Ethnographic Film Festival (Ethnofest), and TwixtLab, the 2nd Conference of Social Anthropologists of Greece, in Thessaloniki, May 24-26, 2024 and titled: “Anthropology, Ethnography in/for uncertain times“.
The proceedings of the Conference will take place at the University of Macedonia, the Old Faculty of Philosophy of AUTh, and Islahane. Alongside the Conference, there will be workshops, screenings of ethnographic films, and presentations of publications related to Social Anthropology. Event languages: Greek & English
The Culture-Borders-Gender/LΑΒ (Department of Balkan, Slavic, and Oriental Studies – University of Macedonia) and the 100memories research project (Institute of Historical Research – National Research Foundation), in collaboration with the Cultural Venue of Islahane (Ministry of Culture), are jointly organizing an international, hybrid, and nomadic Conference (University of Macedonia-City-Islahane) in September 2023, with the theme:
Within / Outside the City Walls: Refugee neighborhoods of Thessaloniki (22-23/9/2023)
The concept of the ‘neighborhood’, as a subset of urban space, has been an important category in the sociological analysis of migration and refugeeness since the early 20th century. In 1925, Park and Burgess, published their classic work The City (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2019) that established them as founders of the Chicago School. Their research linked the migration of African-Americans and Spanish-speaking migrants to the creation of the so-called ‘ethnic neighborhoods’. This perception was also associated with the understanding of the refugee neighborhood as a site of resistance against assimilation and integration policies, while in many cases, ethnic neighborhoods became synonymous with ghettos. With the end of European colonialism, when Anthropology returns home, particularly to the Mediterranean environment of Europe, it hesitantly includes the study of urban space, focusing on neighborhoods. Despite the paradoxical intentions, it highlights the significance of place as a signifier of socialization and the formation of gendered self, citizenship, and the management of individual and collective memory. This participatory field observation has methodologically contributed to the multifaceted and dynamic dimension of the neighborhood for the production of knowledge and politics. In Greece, the refugee waves of 1922 intensified ethnic deviations from the national standard/archetype, not only due to reasons of language or religious difference, as exemplified in Thessaloniki between Jews and refugees, but also due to class and regional factors. After the 1922 ‘Asia Minor Catastrophe’ and the forced exchange of population based on the Treaty of Lausanne (1923), refugees who settled in the rural areas of northern Greece, Athens, Piraeus, as well as the urban environment within and outside the walls of Thessaloniki, had a significant impact on the country’s economic, social, and political life. The first ethnographic research on the “Heirs of the Asia Minor Catastrophe” was conducted in Kokkinia, a “refugee neighborhood” of Piraeus, by anthropologist Renée Hirschon during the 1970s (Heirs of the Greek Catastrophe: The Social Life of Asia Minor Refugees in Piraeus. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989). In Thessaloniki, our relationship with the Others/foreigners/persecuted has historically been shaped through personal narratives, everyday trivialities, materialities, traumas, delights, memories, and experiences which were not of interest to the grand narratives of national memory and are absent from our city’s national historical and archaeological museums.
The conference invites researchers in social sciences and humanities who use fieldwork, those who focus on the study of official and unofficial archival material, as well as those who have creatively (e.g., in literature, visual arts, cinema) been inspired by the lives of people in refugee neighborhoods, both within and outside the walls of Thessaloniki, to participate in the meeting.
Following the path of ethnography and cultural studies, we seek to explore in Thessaloniki, and beyond, the significance of ‘locality’ and ‘neighborhood’ in the context of inclusive and even conflictual relationships between refugees and other residents, as well as among themselves. Additionally, we aim to gain knowledge about everyday life and the trivial things, focusing on personal narratives, artist’s creative imagination, and fiction. Narratives creating ruptures and openings beyond the nostalgic reconstruction of the refugee past have been systematically ignored by the national narrative, but also for a more reflective and contemplative understanding of the present. This understanding maps the traumas and dynamics of the refugee condition in the current moment (see Svetlana Βoym, The Future of Nostalgia. New York: Basic Books, 2001).
The conference includes panels, workshops, walking tours, atelier-anti-tours, meetings at local spots, and a round-table discussion, in dialogue with European Cultural Days (2023 “Living Heritage”). As an honorary guest, Renée Hirschon, Professor Emerita of Anthropology at the University of Oxford, will return to her ethnographic field to highlight the significance of refugeeness in the present. She will explore its everyday construction of women’s gendered experience and its management of memory, both in material and narrative ways, within and outside the neighborhood, within the city and the state.
Venue and Mode of Conduct
The conference will take place at the University of Macedonia and at the Cultural Venue of Islahane. The mode of conduct will be hybrid. For those attending the conference hybridly and only if they need a certificate of attendance, it is necessary to complete the following registration form: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1c1EheqOHtclVWTeOQkJhSNlwlqJy3zOZ3MSgE_iCMZg/edit For those attending the conference in person and only if they need a certificate of attendance, it is necessary to register before the start of the conference, outside the conference hall of the University of Macedonia.
Organization:
Culture-Borders-Gender/LAB, University of Macedonia
Special Research Fund, University of Macedonia
Institute of Historical Research/National Hellenic Research Foundation
Service of Modern Monuments & Technical Works of Central Macedonia (YNMTEKM), Ministry of Culture (YPPPO)
Cultural Venue of Islahane
European Heritage Days 2023
Scientific Committee:
R. Hirschon (Professor Emerita, University of Oxford)
E. Voutyra (Professor Emerita, Department of Balkan, Slavic and Oriental Studies, University of Macedonia)
F. Tsibiridou (Professor, Department of Balkan, Slavic and Oriental Studies, University of Macedonia, Scientific Coordinator)
I. Manos (Associate Professor, Department of Balkan, Slavic and Oriental Studies, University of Macedonia)
E. Sideri (Assistant Professor, Department of Balkan, Slavic and Oriental Studies, University of Macedonia)
E. Kyramargiou (Historian & Research Associate, Institute of Historical Research/National Hellenic Research Foundation)
O. Lafazani (PhD in Social Geography, Harokopio University)
A. Ioannidou (Professor, Department of Balkan, Slavic and Oriental Studies, University of Macedonia)
S. Mavrogeni (Professor, Department of Balkan, Slavic and Oriental Studies, University of Macedonia)
M. Tsantsanoglou (Deputy General Director of MOMus and Artistic Director of MOMus-Museum of Modern Art)
A. Kondylidou (Archaeologist and Social Anthropologist)
C. Chrysanthopoulos (Special Teaching Staff, Institute of Historical Research/National Hellenic Research Foundation)
M. Zermpoulis (Researcher/Scientific Associate of the CBG/Lab)
Organizing Committee:
D. Katayftsis (Researcher/Scientific Associate of the CBG/Lab)
Ch. Grammatikopoulou (Art Historian/Scientific Associate of the CBG/Lab)
E. Kapetanaki (PhD in Social Anthropology/Secondary Education Teacher)
N. Manolas (PhD Candidate in Social Anthropology, Department of Balkan, Slavic and Oriental Studies, University of Macedonia)
A. Mitropanou (Graduate Student, MA Program, Department of Balkan, Slavic and Oriental Studies, University of Macedonia)
Ch. Groballi (Graduate Student, MA Program, Department of Balkan, Slavic and Oriental Studies, University of Macedonia)
A. Moumtzoglou (Special Teaching Staff, Department of Balkan, Slavic and Oriental Studies, University of Macedonia)
The Greek node of the international conference “The Virtual, Otherwise” will take place in the Public Benefit Foundation of Nikolaos and Eleni Porfyrogenis in Agria onThursday, Friday and Saturday June 2-4, 2022.The program combines the screening of recorded keynotes and panels, live online discussions with anthropologists in various parts of the world and parallel actions (podcasts, exhibitions, games, music, screenings, theater workshop) that will be conducted live. Indicative program Thursday, June 2 12.00 Instagram Lives (Cairo) 13.00 Have you heard this? (podcast) 14.00 Sound Booth 15.00 The Joy of Glitching 16.00 Film Shorts: Feminist storytelling: engaging the future through the past 19.00 KEYNOTE Corazón de Robota (She-Robot Heart) 20.30 Opening – Welcome to the conference 21.00 Otherwise Athens: Four Prospects of Virtuality in the City Friday June 3rd 9.00 Ghosting the City: Zooming in on Otherwise Publics in Virtual Worlds (Hamburg) 11.00 KEYNOTE Surveillance Capital and Occupation 12.00 Sound Booth 13.00 Artist’s Block: Creative Collaborations on Post-Soviet Panel-Block Apartment Art 15.00 Diasporic Praxis: Re-thinking Ethnographic Approaches to the Balkans (Bulgaria) 17.00 Exhibition– Environmental manifestations of trauma 18.00 Let’s decolonize the City! The Game & Video 19.00 Sound Booth 20.30 Desktop Cinema (Views on the Terrace) 21.30 Ethnographic film selections (Views on the Terrace) Saturday June 4th 11.00 ΚΕΥΝΟΤΕ Aimee Meredith Cox 12-13.30 Say otherwise/Αnthrobombing Workshop (pre-registration only) 13.00 Virtual Geographies of Los Angeles: Responses to Ecology of Fear (UCLA) 13.30-14.30 Sound Booth 14.00 The Map, the Story & the Photograph: Multimodal Methods Against the Grain of Environmental Change 16.00 Sound Booth 17.00 Perspectives on public anthropology: open discussion with Anthrobombing 21.00 Music in the Metaverse !!!! Organization & coordination Penelope Papaelia Penny Paspali Organizing team Evi Despotopoulou Konstantinos Diamantis Kostis Kalantzis Mel Kalfanti Violetta Koutsoukou Dana Papachristou Mimina Paterakis Petros Petridis Eleni Sideri Sharon Jacobs Nick Smith Student Support Group Univ. Thessaly Phoebus Zotis Fotini Kitou George Konstantinou Dimitra Morosou Michalis Panagiotopoulos Anastasia Strimtsou Erica Chiukadana Olga Fotou-Parthenidou Ilias Marios Haliamalias Support agencies Society for Cultural Anthropology Society for Visual Anthropology Experimental Humanities Collaborative Network Cooperation agencies Social Anthropology Laboratory, PTH Association of Social Anthropologists of Greece Culture-Borders-Gender/LAB, PAMAK Anthrobombing KTEL of Magnesia Courtesy of space: The Charitable Foundation of Nikolaos and Eleni Porphyrogenis
On the occasion of the hundredth anniversary of
1922, 2022 will be dedicated to the ‘refugee phenomenon’. The gradual inclusion
of refugees from Asia Minor, Pontus and other areas of population exchange was
an important part of the economic development and modernisation of the society
in Greece. Research has been conducted since the 1920s documenting the economic
contribution of refugees to the development of the host country (Aigidis 1928).
The keywords ‘development’, ‘refugees’ are conceptually and theoretically
charged terms because of the multiple and conflicting views and interpretations
often identified with the developmental policies which are sometimes applied to
expatriate populations in specific areas like Africa and Middle East.
The conference will focus on the
experience of 1922 precisely through the possibilities and perspectives that
opened in the Greek society and economy for a dynamic transformation. What were
the international and national policies and practices that supported this
transformation? What were the reactions of the society and the refugees
themselves? When, by whom and for how long are they considered ‘refugees’? What
are the short-term, medium-term and long-term assessments of the ‘refugee
factor’? At the same time, the experience of 1922 will be used comparatively to
open a discussion with relevant experiences from the wider south-eastern Europe
and the Mediterranean basin as well as the current policies and practices
implemented or proposed and treat refugees positively as a potential research
for development for the host country. What does the concept of ‘positive
example’ (success) mean in the case of a ‘refugee crisis’ (economic, social and
cultural integration)? How does it help us to understand and socially integrate
new categories of refugees into modern reality.
The conference will take place at University of
Macedonia -Thessaloniki in a hybrid way.
Proposed themes -refugees and economic development -inclusion policies -inclusion and housing, urban and residential changes -work and gender -refugee capital and home countries -inner migration and urbanisation -refugees and cultural capital (case studies) -comparative example, case studies -international organisations, development aid and refugees -education-language-host country -museum, literary and artistic prints
Organisation: Department of Balkan, Slavic and Oriental
Studies, Laboratory of Culture, Borders and Gender, Department of Economics,
Laboratory of Economic and Social Research, Department of Music Science and
Arts, MA in “History, Anthropology and Culture in Eastern and Southeastern
Europe, MA in ” Human Rights and Migration Studies “
Scientific Committee: Eleni Gavra (Professor UoM),
Eftihia Voutira (Professor Emerita UoM), Fotini Tsimbiridou (Professor UoM),
Konstantinos Tsitselikis (Professor UoM), Eleftherios Tsοulfidis Professor UoM), Theodore
Panagiotidis (Professor, UoΜ),Theodosios Karvounarakis (Professor UoM), Eleni Sideri (Assist. Professor UoM), Eleni Kallimopoulou (Assist. Professor UoM), Eleftherios Tsikouridis
(Assist. Professor UoM), Alexandra Ioannidou (Professor UoM,
Ioannis Manos (Ass. Professor UoM), Nikolaos Zaikos (Ass. Professor UoM),
Stavroula Mavrogeni (Ass. Professor UoM),
Nikolaos Liazos (Assist. Professor UoM)
Organising Committee: Eleni Gavra (Professor UoM), Eleni Sideri (Assist. Professor UoM), Anna
Moumtzoglou (Special Tech. Staff, UoM), Styliani Letsiou (Adjunct Faculty, MA
in Human Rights and Migration Studies, Postdoctoral Fellow UoM), Dorotheos
Orfanidis (Postdoctoral Fellow UoM), Stefanos Katsoulis (PhD Candidate UoM)
Interested parties should send until 31/3/2022,
a title, a summary (300 words), 5 keywords and 1-2 reference titles, as well as
a short bio (5 lines) to refugeesanddevelopment2022@gmail.com.
Registration for the conference will be 50 euros. For PhD. candidates will be 25 euros. Attendance of the conference for the undergraduate and postgraduate students will be free of charge.
The 15th World Congress of Semiotics aims to foreground semiotics as the socially engaged, critical investigation of the sign – and meaning-making processes forming the core of human worldmaking. Semiotic investigation is grounded in the historical lifeworld, in concrete timescapes and semioscapes, in the dense and dynamic weave of semiotic practices that structure human experience and communicative (inter)action by constantly (re)articulating the perceptual and the conceptual, the discursive, and the performative, the ethical and the aesthetic, the ideological and the figurative, the material and the immaterial, the human and the non-human, the natural and the man-made.
This workshop will be organized by the initiative Decolonize Hellas,
under the cluster of Cosmopolitanisms/Cosmopolitics. Within this context
and, more broadly, within our critique on the self- and
hetero-colonizing processes of the hegemonic discourse of Western
epistemology and white supremacy, we look into the meanings and
transformations of classic Cosmopolitanism, as they have appeared in the
era of Colonization and as they survive in the present. In the wake of
postcolonial critique and intersubjective multiculturalism, while also
counter-pointing the classical or more contemporary notions of
cosmopolitanism, we aim to bring in discussion the notions of race and
racism, patriarchy and colonial technologies along with intersectional,
feminist and other transindividual and embodied activist experiences of
heteropolitics – an effort inspired by glocal movements of
decolonization and sustains an open dialog with the epistemologies of
the South. We look for cosmopolitical practices in social movements,
anti/counter-courses, research perspectives and artistic interventions,
in planning and cooperative projects, in politics enacted differently.
We attend to subaltern voices and histories, as they survive in
marginality or in a constant state of borders and liminality, forming
the politics of everyday life, knowledge and questioning of academic
thought and practice.
We will answer questions such as:
Could we find nearby examples of local and supralocal
epistemologies, analogous to the epistemologies of the South, that are
entangled with cosmopolitical practices of decolonization?
How do the categories of familiar precarity (minorities, refugees,
migrants, women, precarious lives and other forms of exclusion), as well
as the reflective observation of the boundaries of exclusion, conjoin
creatively past cosmologies and technologies, mingling practice with
theory?
How can all the parallel familiar histories of personal experiences,
local cosmologies, ethnographic research, oral history, and feminist
methodologies be articulated with art, technical knowledge and
technology?
To what extent do practices of inclusion, care and heteropolitics
talk back to personal self-interest, to the capitalist exploitation, the
colonial matrix of structural racism, of occupation and enclosures, of
patriarchy, and of domination over nature?
What leeway do we have for decolonizing knowledge and politics in
Greece and its neighborhoods, referring to the values of humanism but
also in search of a universal ideal that will not divide but instead
include?
“On cosmopolitics: ethnography and counter publics, marginal Balkan cosmologies and creative Aegean epistemologies”
Fotini Tsibiridou (Prof. of Social Anthropology, Head of the Department of Balkan, Slavic and Oriental Studies, University of Macedonia)
Abstract
The presentation explores the genealogies, meanings, and dimensions of cosmopolitics, as it is being crystallized between research and activism in the heart of Latin America, while also tries to fuel the debate over epistemologies of the South in the context of decolonization today. We look on the importance of intersectionality and precarity in shaping actions and initiatives that challenge hegemony, authoritarianism and the colonization of knowledge about self and others, while striving for the coexistence of life in the planet. Drawing on the example of an ethnographic research on social movements and feminist methodologies in the center of the Global city-Istanbul, but also on the experience gathered from engaging with the collectivity of the Social Workshop of Thessaloniki, from 2008 and for 9 years on, the presentation firstly seeks to identify the coincidences, differences and deviations from the lucophonic world. The encounter of dëcoloиıze hellαş with the possibilities of cosmopolitics opens up new paths for the instrumental and creative exploration of marginal and forgotten cosmologies, such as those still found in the Balkans and Anatolia, which could introduce alternative epistemologies of cosmo-eco-techno-political knowledge (such as those found within the Aegean Sea), in a certain analogy with the Epistemologies of the South.
The presentation proposes examples of alternative publics and anti/counter-courses that will blend academic knowledge and research with activist practices. Instead of simply highlighting voices, differences and tolerance, as postcolonial critique often does, we reflect on the dynamics of alternative epistemologies in the path of cosmopolitics, a reflection capable of transforming the demands of cosmopolitan humanness and its civilizing mission into more equal, inclusive and non-divisive ventures of coexistence in everyday life that strive for self-knowledge and emancipation. Alternative epistemologies of conjoint histories and practices of cosmopolitics, that promote inclusion and care and often have a feminine aura, as they are articulated with feminist methodologies, shape, hesitantly or more vigorously, a deviation from the rationalization imposed by the compliance to the matrix of Western colonization of race, class, gender, region, periphery, heteronormativity and any other trope of exception. Experiences that creatively use marginal Balkan cosmologies or the palimpsest of untold stories that anthropology and oral history often encounter in the Balkan area and in the Aegean islands and coasts, assemble stories and experiences of a new kind of citizenship: life stories and place mythologies that are forbidden, forgotten and disavowed by dominant ideologies and theologies, traumatic memories of subaltern subjects, and muted, dark creatures and materialities. In this context, the presentation will go though stories, experiences, and actions, suitable for research, teaching and alternative publics, that go beyond the Western binary of majorities and minorities and challenge the white supremacy of the empire, the European advantage and the technological superiority as the only alternative of the chain of production, challenge also the urban gentrification projects that sacrifice cities on the altar of uncontrolled development and growth, and the over-exploitation of nature by man.
Fotini Tsibiridou is Professor of Social
Anthropology at the Department of Balkan, Slavic and Oriental Studies at
the University of Macedonia and acting Director of the Laboratory for
the Study of Culture, Borders and Gender. She has done fieldwork in a
former refugee village and among the Pomaks in Greek Thrace, in
Macedonian and Peloponnese villages and the Sultanate of Oman. She has
also researched nationalism and multiculturalist discourses and
practices in Greek Thrace, as well as gender, citizenship and creative
counterpublics in Istanbul. Currently (since 2018), she is researching
two topics: post-Ottoman religiosity and gendered subjectivity in the
frame of post-colonial critique (Balkans, Turkey, the Middle East), and
feminist and other decolonizing methodologies deployed in creative
protests and resistance practices in Mediterranean cities in the way
to/of cosmopolitics. She is the cofounder of the CREABALK – Creative
Balkans network. https://www.uom.gr/en/ft
“Cosmopolitical Technegeographies: Epistemologies of the South and artifacts-artifices. Toward a decolonization of design”
Iris Lykourioti (Assistant Prof. Department of Architecture, University of Thessaly / A Whale’s architects)
Abstract
The Epistemologies of the South developed by Santos (2012),
like decoloniality, apart from being theoretical paradigms that
emphasize criticism, constitute a program for broadening the realities
and potentialities of our present, past (sociology of absences) and future (sociology of emergences). They aim at the creation of future systems of social production and epistemological formation (ecology of knowledges).
They can facilitate the transcendence of binary perceptions of social
phenomena and the abyssal social and geopolitical inequalities that have
been produced through the centuries of the historical complicity
between capitalism, colonialism and patriarchy within the program of
modernity. Epistemologies of the South function as a
theoretical-epistemological system that aspires at bridging theory and
practice (co-production of emancipatory theories and practices) under a
‘rear-guard’ model (intertwined with social movements, demands and
resistances), rather than an ‘avant-guard’ model (emancipation stemming
from the instructions given by an inspired-specialized elite). Epistemologies of the South can be understood as artisanal work (craft) as opposed to architectural work.
Taking epistemologies of the South as a point of departure
(together with theories and practices such as degrowth, peer-to-peer
production and ecofeminism), we attempt to imagine
design-and-construction futures for producing our contemporary material
cultures. We are interested in those futures of making that give
precedence to justice, self-sufficiency and emancipation for those
subjects that are involved in the making processes (access to materials,
social and labor rights, knowledges). In the framework of the
research-postgraduate program Technegeographies held at the
University of Thessaly and within the methodologies we apply for making
spaces and material objects in our design work (A Whale’s architects
office for architecture), we experiment on the basis of two principles:
a) the coalescence (not competition) between traditional techniques,
technical knowledges and technical infrastructures and cutting-edge
technologies both widely distributed in both urban and rural
environments, and b) the broadening of bibliographical references to
both works of folklore/popular/traditional and erudite/high arts, crafts
and architectures. Both principles intend to develop coalescent/hybrid
techne-epistemic paradigms in the making of things. We are interested in
understanding the technical conditions of material production within
the contradictions of the Greek peripherality and of crafting potential
techniques-artifices that can reverse those conditions. We think that those hybrid techne-epistemic paradigms can deliver artifacts that
are socially sustainable and socially integrated because they are based
on the abundance (not the scarcity) of widely distributed technologies
and technical knowledges, at the scale of small independent production
units. Thus they can relieve-reverse structural discriminations and
divides between manual and intellectual work or between the city and the
countryside. Furthermore they can generate types of ‘artifices’
(innovation) by cultivating inventiveness at a wider scale, socially and
geographically. They do that by undoing enclosures (processes of
decolonization) of technical knowledge and ingenuity that both condition
the chances and rights that societies have for good life and well being
(ευ ζην, buen vivir, sumak kawsay κ.α.). We consider that such artifacts and artifices,
as products of inclusive, pluriversal, not elitist processes of making,
constitute cosmopolitical schemes for the creation of decolonized,
cosmopolitan habitats and decolonized aesthetic paradigms.
Iris Lykourioti (b.1970, Athens) is an
architect (NTUA 1996, 2001) and Assistant Professor at the Department of
Architecture, University of Thessaly, Greece. In 2005 she co-founded A
Whale’s architects, an office based in Athens and Brussels doing
objects, edifices and research on how the former are being produced and
used. Taking into account the anthropogenic character of the production
of edifices and the importance of artisanship as fundamental knowledge
in social economy and culture, they support the distribution of free
lance labor in the production of design objects. Rather than adjusting
readymade industrial items, they design and produce buildings and
prototype objects in collaboration, exclusively, with qualified artisans
and small or family industries. In 2014 the work of A Whale’s
architects has been selected by Blueprint Magazine among the eight most
innovative architectural practices in Greece. Ηer current academic
interests focus on four main fields: a) on epistemological topics
related to architectural composition and material production, b) on
space, historiography and theory related to gender issues, c) on popular
culture and, d) on the political dimension that determines the
relationship between knowledge (omitted history), and the design and
production of space and material objects, based on the theoretical
framework described as Epistemologies of the South. She has edited
books, published articles and exhibited architectural projects and
research internationally.
“Contemporary democratic alter-politics and grounded political theory”
Alexandros Kioupkiolis (Associate Professor of Contemporary Political Theory at Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece)
Abstract
Recent decades have witnessed the rise of a diverse alternative
democratic politics which strives to foster equal freedom in our times
breaking both with the mainstream representative politics of parties and
governments in the political system and with typical traditions of
civic activism. The ‘alter-politics’ (Hage 2015) assigns priority to
practice over ideological doctrine, and it champions a visionary
pragmatism, which appeals to the people at large. Contemporary
democratic alter-politics binds together ‘prefiguration,’ social
innovation and counterinstitutions with mass mobilization and
involvement with state institutions. It combines assembly-based
democracy with representative governance, and it crosses the divide
reform/revolution. It is both place-based and globally networked.
Finally, this alter-politics is infused with another logic and ethic,
which forswear dogmatism and purism, they attend to complexity,
diversity, messiness and contradiction, they acknowledge the lack of
easy fixes to vexing challenges, they cherish plurality, openness,
reflexivity and experimentation.
In our research project –Heteropolitics– we have undertaken a
more empirically grounded research into contemporary social movements,
institutions and practices that contrive alternative ways of doing
politics and of self-governing communities in crisis-ridden Southern
Europe (Greece, Italy and Spain). In this research venture, political
theory is animated by the idea that an interplay of political thought
with anthropology and ethnographic fieldwork can help us to ‘decolonize’
political theory by rethinking and reimagining politics for the cause
of equal freedom and the commons through an ethnographic intercourse
with everyday political activity and thought. This intercourse is vital
for fleshing out more grounded, applicable, specific, variable and
concrete conceptions of the political. It is also commendable from the
standpoint of a democratic political theory whose practice would be
inspirited itself by the values of freedom and equality in the polity. A
democratic political theorist does not see her work as the production
of conceptual analyses and normative assessments from a position of
authority, of ‘the subject who knows’ the truth and conveys this truth
or prescribes it to the laypeople. S/he regards, rather, her profession
as thought, analysis and discussion which partakes in an ongoing
political conversation with other citizens, on a footing of equality,
whereby the theorist contributes as an equal citizen to collective
debates and deliberations. Hence, the theorist needs to engage with the
ideas and practices of her fellow citizens, interlocutors and political
rivals.
Alexandros Kioupkiolis is Associate Professor of
Contemporary Political Theory at Aristotle University, Thessaloniki,
Greece. He has studied Classics (BA, University of Athens), and
Contemporary Political Theory (MA, Essex University, DPhil, Oxford
University). His research interests are focussed on radical democracy,
the commons, social movements, and the philosophy of freedom. He has
directed an ERC COG project on these topics (Heteropolitics, 2017-2020)
and has published numerous relevant books and papers, including the
monograph Freedom after the critique of foundations (Palgrave Macmillan
2012), and the co-edited collective volumes Radical democracy and
collective movements today (Ashgate 2014, with G. Katsambekis). Recent
publications include the papers ‘Commoning the Political, Politicizing
the Common’ (Contemporary Political Theory 17.3, 2018), ‘Movements
post-hegemony: how contemporary collective action transforms hegemonic
politics’ (Social Movement Studies, 17.1, 2018), the co-edited volume
The Populist Radical Left in Europe (Routledge 2019, with G.
Katsambekis), and the monograph Τhe Common and Counter-hegemonic
Politics (Edinburgh University Press 2019).
“Vivid social spaces or monumentalization? Gentrification
policies and the production of «non places» at Thessaloniki’s historical
centre”
Miltiadis Zermpoulis (Dr. of Social
Anthropology-University of Macedonia, Researcher/ Deputy Head of the
Institute for Transcultural Competence at the Police Academy of the Free
and Hanseatic City of Hamburg)
Abstract
This presentation is founded upon the discussion about
“cosmopolitics” and “cosmologies” in the daily life of the city in order
to point out unpopular discourses, social practices and agencies from
below that had been reproducing socially the space around the old town
Hall, well known by the citizens of Thessaloniki as “Kervanserai”.
Processes and politics of gentrification and “cultural” salience of the
space according to national and colonial monumentalization strategies
endanger the spatial reality of an urban memory palimpsest and an
intersectional life in the neighborhood. For almost a hundred years,
residents, shopkeepers, visitors and buildings (monumental or not) had
been forming a vivid network of interaction, producing and reproducing
socially this famous neighborhood of antique shops, cheap and occasional
consumption, and also night life for ordinary people – right at the
historical center of the city. The last fifteen years this space
reflects a sense of abandonment and dereliction. It seems that this
dereliction and disarray of the spatial social network is connected to
hegemonic gentrification policies that overlook the social relations
and the modern history of the space, banishing violently actors and
practices that are constitutive of this neighborhood. Regarding these
differently articulated discourses and practices which help imagine and
mark the future of this space our presentation is willing to
problematize the special meaning of being and becoming a monument in the
theoretical frame of colonization. We openly discuss alternative uses
that can free and unblock the space and its materialities from the
symbolic and national politics of cultural and racial supremacy, and
religious conservatism. A process of “demonumentalization” and
“desymbolization” of the urban space and its materialities can be, on
one side, useful “cosmopolitically” for a more democratic and equal
participation in the city and, on the other side, can prevent its social
dereliction. Such an attitude under the terms of decolonization could
probably create continuities for day-to-day intimacies, activating the
reflection on repressed ways of life in the city.
Miltiadis Zermpoulis holds a PhD in Social
Anthropology from the Department of Balkan, Slavic and Oriental Studies
at the University of Macedonia in Thessaloniki. Between 2017 and 2021 he
worked for a migrant organization in North Rhine – Westphalia, Germany.
From 1 June 2021 he works as research associate and deputy head of the
department at the Institute for Transcultural Competence at the Police
Academy of the Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg. Miltiadis conducted
fieldwork in Germany and Greece. His academic interests include material
culture, anthropology of space, state culture, social classes,
post-colonial theories, ethnic/ religious minorities and migration.
“‘The Women’s Centre of Karditsa’: Heteropolitics and the
Politics of Care in the context of an ecosystem of Social and Solidarity
Economy”
Aimilia Voulvouli, Social Anthropologist, Post-doctoral researcher, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Abstract
The presentation will trace the ‘heteropolitics’, that is,
alternative forms of political participation, of anintersectional
venture namely, the Cooperative Ecosystem of Karditsa (CEK), which
promotes collective self-management of common resources and has the
potential tocatalyze democratic transformation towards more liberal and
egalitarian societies. In this framework, I will briefly present CEK as
an intersectional venture that produces another politics of
self-management and horizontality, alternative to the vertical
hieararchy of state-centred politics and then I will focus on the
Women’s Centre of Karditsa (WCK) which is one of the founding entities
of the ecosystem.
Τhe Womens’ Centre of Karditsa stimulates the political imaginary of
everyday interactions permeated by the affective engagement of ones’
work subject and the ethics of care that circumscribe their work. These
result in the practice of affective micropolitics that enact the
unimaginable, proliferate innovations and animate micro-transformations
that have the potential to effect macro-transformations, initially in
the ecosystem and gradually beyond its borders. At the same time, it
cultivates a collective condition of existence where the subjectivities
involved are re-produced through the decolonization of the political
from the hierarchical state-centred model but also through the
assumption that the ‘personal is political’. In this way, the Ethics of
care are transformed into a ‘politics of care’ that prefigurates
politics in common (commoning) and challenge economic, social, cultural
and gender hierarchies and hegemonies and address issues of equality,
justice and democracy.
Aimilia Voulvouli (B.A. Univerity of the Aegean,
MA SOAS, Ph.D UCL), is a social anthropologist, currently a
post-doctoral researcher at the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
She has conducted ethnographic research in Turkey, Greece and USA. Her
research interests include the study collective action, the commons,
precarity, and the politics of everyday lifeand she has published the
relevant monograph From Environmentalism to Transenvironmentalism: The
Ethnography of an Urban Protest in Modern Istanbul (Peter Lang 2008),as
well as contributions to collective volumes such asthe chapter
‘Anatolian Tigers and Anatolian scarves: Neo-liberal entrepreneurship
and neo-islamic ethics in a central Anatolian city of Turkey (in
Tsibiridou Fotini (ed.) Ethnography and Everyday practices in ‘Our Own
East’. Athens: Kritiki Publishing, 2020, in Greek), articles in journals
such as ‘The vicious circle of precarity: Being academic in the era of
Neoliberalism and Authoritarianism’ (Social Anthropology/Anthropologie
Sociale, 2019) and ‘From Tarlabaşı to Gezi and beyond: The 2013 event in
the conjuncture of Neoliberal times’ (Greek Review of Social Research,
2017).
“For the decolonisation of ethnographic practice”
Penny Travlou (Lecturer in Cultural Geography and
Theory, Edinburgh School of Architecture & Landscape Architecture,
University of Edinburgh)
Abstract
In the introduction of the book “Epistemologies of the South”,
Buoventura de Sousa Santos proposes a Manifesto for BuenVivir, ‘good
life’, in juxtaposition with a Manifesto for Intellectual Activists. He
issues a call for resistance to TINA and the triad of the Global North,
capitalism, colonialism and patriarchy, by envisioning the
possibilit(ies) of an alternative world. This is a double call: to
acknowledge the importance of the epistemologies of the South, and to
recognise the necessity for political action. “It is a time of epistemological imagination aimed at refounding the political imagination […] to strengthen the social struggles against domination” (Santos 2018: 126-127).
Following Santos’ two manifestos, I will unpack how thinking from the
South requires an epistemic decolonisation of the ‘ethnographic
practice’. The question here is very simple: What are the methodological
tools to think with others for an alternative world? The
presentation will draw from multi-sited ethnographic fieldwork in
Medellin (Colombia) and Athens (Greece) – two cities that challenge the
dichotomy of centre and periphery, Global North and South – during the
last 6 years, a time of socio-political upheaval. The study looks at
intangible cultural heritage as currently constructed within the
framework of everyday resistance and struggles to create cultural
commons, shared knowledges and practices, in the search for alternatives
to capitalism, colonialism, and patriarchy. Unlearning, radical
imagination, thinking with others, are some of the methodological tools
that have been experimented with and tested throughout the ethnographic
fieldwork, to allow an emerging pluriversal network of knowledges to
become visible.
Penny Travlou is a Lecturer in Cultural
Geography and Theory (Edinburgh School of Architecture & Landscape
Architecture, University of Edinburgh). Her research focuses on politics
of public space, social justice, the commons, collaborative practices,
cultural landscapes and ethnography. She has been involved in
international research projects funded by the EU and UK Research
Councils. Since 2011, she has been doing ethnographic research on
collaborative practices in emerging networks (e.g. digital art
practitioners, collaborative economy initiatives, translocal migrants).
Her most recent research is on cultural commons in Colombia and
solidarity networks in Athens. Alongside her academic work, Penny is an
activist on social justice and urban commons. She is Co-director of the
Feminist Autonomous Centre for Research (https://feministresearch.org/).
“From the internal exclusion to Cosmopolitics”
Michalis Bartsidis (Dr. of Political Pholosophy, Hellenic Open University, Scientific Director of the Nicos Poulantzas Institute).
Abstract
In the context of classical cosmopolitanism, what prevailed was the
dominant universal ideal of the linear progress of humanity towards its
union, having as its aim the creation of a peaceful, civilized and
fraternal world. This ideal served as a common representation of
individuals, groups and classes inspiring respective practices. However,
before but mainly during the 20th century, a series of historical
events (colonialism, the Holocaust) and processes (collapse of modern
unifying ideologies, migratory movements, perpetuation of various
inequalities) dissolved this perspective leaving a field of
heterogeneous representations of a divided humanity with multiple
temporalities. Today, the issue is no longer just the inequalities. It
is their consolidation by articulating various exclusions in a
particular and paradoxical social, cultural and anthropological
condition: we live and act in a universality without a universal ideal.
The absence of a universal ideal creates an internal blockage in the
process of constituting individual and collective identities. In a
condition of internal exclusion the human subjects are
hovering, almost hysterically we would say, without being able to use
any model of transforming passions into reason and experiences into
thought, thus narrowing the inner space, that is the vantage point from
which they see the infinity of the world as more and more finite.
Modern cosmopolitan Western values also functioned as hegemonic
demarcations, as hierarchies that were imposed on a vast variety of
other knowledge, cosmologies and practices of the peoples, tribes and
communities of the global South, leading to a constant “knowledgecide”
of the multiple “metis”(μήτις) of the world, resulting in loss of
sovereignty as well as in loss of the possibility of emancipation.
Going into the decolonial condition, these hierarchies,
discriminations and exclusions that lead to excessive violence(and the
resistance in a Fanonian modality), now continue within the boundaries
of the western countries, somehow internalizing now the boundaries that
were imposed on others of the “rest of the world”.
We oppose cosmopolitics to abstract ideals, as practices that
challenge social hierarchies, racial sovereignty, and cultural hegemony.
According to an ontology that we can qualify as transindividual,
the constitution of the subjects and the constitution of their mutual
relation are viewed as simultaneous processes. From that perspective the
social bond is to be situated within us and at the same time outside
us, on the level of common practices, experiences, images and
institutions. Instead of divisive and separatist practices, we must
privilege the transindividual practices of inclusion, the experiences of
care, solidarity, autonomy, emancipation and love that allow societies
and individuals to the cross their internal borders.
This project aims to study the World Social Forum – Thessaloniki
Social Workshop (2003, 2009-2013) as an example of alternative politics,
and precisely as an experience of cosmopolitics with a particular focus
on the “Cosmopolit seminar” inspired by the experience of the Caracoles
in Chiapa-Zapatistas.
Why is such a double movement of return or recursion and expansion,
so important in the actual decolonial context? On the one hand, those
movements and examples constitute the lost knowledge that was defeated
as soon as it emerged, but was the fruit of an encounter where we
learned to do politics in a different way. We can now recognise and
integrate this knowledge in an inclusive history. On the other hand,
because by articulating these experiences with the planetary crisis, we
aim to contribute by local experiences to a transindividual
non-anthropocentric theory, as an alternative cosmology and ontology.
Michalis Bartsidis, is a Dr. of Political
Philosophy (University of Ioanina) teaches Philosophy at Hellenic Open
University. He is the Scientific Director of the Nicos Poulantzas
Institute. He has taught at the Department of Philosophy and Pedagogy of
the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, at the University of Panteion
and in other Postgraduate Programs. He defended his doctoral
dissertation on: Philosophy and Politics in the work of Etienne Balibar.
He elaborated and supported his postdoctoral position (postdoc) in the
Department of Philosophy of the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki on
“Crossing the ” internal border”, Research οn Political Ethics”. His
publications and research interests move in the field of Political
Philosophy and Contemporary European Philosophy and include the volume
Transidividuality, Essays on an ontology of relation, Athens, Nissos,
2014.
“Refugeeness at Critical Times: affective cosmopolitanism and critical regionalism”
Ioanna Laliotou (Associate Professor in Contemporary History Vice-Rector of Research and Lifelong Learning, University of Thessaly in Greece)
Abstract
Two pivotal concepts derived from postcolonial thought are retrieved
in this presentation: affective cosmopolitanism and critical
regionalism. Both these concepts have been pivotal in the context of
postcolonial theory, globalism and political activism since 2000s. I
seek to revisit these two concepts in the light of developments related
to refugee movements in the Eastern Mediterranean and Greece during the
last decade. These two concepts are presented through bibliographical
references to writings of thinkers such as Gayatri Spivak and Paul
Gilroy. Subsequently, there is an attempt to relate these concepts with
the contemporary realities of refugeeness and developments that took
place in Greece during the last decade. I propose to rethink refugeeness
and postcolonial concepts in relation to two major parallel and
intertwined planetary, but also local events: the 2008- fiscal crisis on
the one hand and the current pandemic crisis on the other. During the
last two two years, the antinomies and related to refugee statelessness
within the nation state were further aggravated by the pandemic
conditions. The pandemic has opened up a new space of unprecedented
state intervention in the public and private lives of citizens, while
reconfiguring the meaning of globalization. Questions of democracy,
statehood and statelessness, mobility, access, restriction and enclosure
are now re-conditioned under the two-fold historical contingency of
refugee life and citizen life in a pandemic.
Ioanna Laliotou is Associate
Professor in Contemporary History at the Department of History,
Archaeology and Social Anthropology, University of Thessaly in Greece.
She is currently Vice-Rector of Research and Lifelong Learning. She is
author of Transatlantic Subjects. Acts of Migration and Cultures of
Transnationalism between Greece and America (Chicago: Chicago University
Press, 2004) and co-editor of the collective book Women migrants
between the East and the West: Gender, mobility and belonging in
contemporary Europe (London: Berghan, 2007). She writes, teaches and
researches on issues related to cultural history, subjectivity,
mobility, migration, refugeeness and visions of future and utopia in
contemporary society. Her most recent book is Ιστορία του Μέλλοντος. Πως
ο 20ος αι. Φαντάστηκε έναν «άλλο κόσμο» [History of the Future. How the 20th
century imagined a different world] (Αθήνα, ΕΚΤ, 2017) is on The Future
in History: how the twentieth century imagined the future (Αthens: EKT,
2016). She has been a Fulbright Visiting Scholar and an Andrew Mellon
Visiting Professor at Columbia University.
Organizers: dëcoloиıze hellάş in collaboration with the Decolonial Initiative at Brown University Convenors: Yannis Hamilakis (Brown University) and Konstantinos Thanasakis (The Laskaridis Foundation, Athens) Language: English (but discussion can be both Greek and English, perhaps Turkish too)
The Acropolis is again in the global news, following the recent and
highly controversial interventions. One of the things that the on-going
public debate has exposed is how little is publicly known about the rich
and fascinating histories of this monumental landscape, beyond the
classical period. In this discussion, part of a series of activities on
“Decolonizing the Acropolis”, we will present and discuss the
historical, archaeological, architectural, artistic, and other evidence
on the Ottoman lives of the Acropolis landscape. Beyond the scholarly
and public importance of this presentation, we hope that our panel will
encourage archaeologists, artists, and heritage specialists to reflect
on how the Ottoman life of this monumental landscape can become more
widely known, commemorated, and incorporated into the various tours and
other activities around the monument.Amongst the questions to be
explored are:- What do we know about the Ottoman Acropolis?- What was
the importance and the meaning of this landscape for the Ottoman,
imperial and local, administration, and for the inhabitants of Athens?-
How did the various visitors to the site react to the Acropolis as an
Ottoman landscape?- How much of that Ottoman material presence remains
on site, despite the two centuries of national purification?- How can we
make such a presence more widely known today?Speakers / Titles of
presentations:1. Şükrü Ilicak (Institute for Mediterranean Studies,
Rethymno), “The Acropolis during the Greek Revolution: New Evidence from
the Ottoman State Archives”2. Tasos Tanoulas (Dr-NTU Athens, in charge
of the Restorations of the Propylaia 1984-2010), “The Ottoman Acropolis
in the frame of Decolonize Hellas: Factual and theoretical
implications”3. Elizabeth Fowden (University of Cambridge), “The Holy
Rock in the City of Sages”4. Dimitris Loupis (Historian, PhD candidate,
Harvard University), “Securing Peace under the Shade of Marbled Past:
The Western Slope of the Acropolis of Athens during the Ottoman Era”
Program/Participants: 1. «Decolonize Hellas/Decolonize the Balkans and Eastern Europe:a first contact», Introductory remarks, by FotiniTsibiridou
2.“Frameworks of race and decolonisation: bridging post-Yugoslav spaces and Hellas”?, podcast by Catherine Baker
3.“Decolonial theory and practices in Eastern and South Eastern Europe”,
SpecialIssuepresentation by Polina Manolova (on behalf of Katarina Kušić,
Philipp Lottholz),
4.“The Return of the Colonial: Understanding the Role of Eastern Europe in Global Colonisation Debates and Decolonial Struggles”, Workshop presentation by Zoltán Ginelli (on behalf of Romina Istratii, Márton Demeter)
5.“Doing epistemic decolonization in Bosnia: peripheral selves”, reflections by Daniela Majstorovic
6.“Thessaloniki and Other Balkan Cities: Monuments, Memory, Representation, Affective Biographies, Cultural Geographies and Everyday Sensory Anthropology”, on the CREABALK network activities by Eleni Sideri (Pierre Sintès, Alessandro Galliccio, Olivier Givre, Fotini Tsibiridou)
Coordination of the panel/discussion:
Ioannis Manos
Bios:
Catherine Baker is Senior Lecturer in 20th Century History(University of Hall). She is a specialist in post-Cold War history, international relations and cultural studies, including the post-Yugoslav region in a transnational and global context.Her research projects are connected by an overarching interest in the politics of representing, narrating and knowing about the past. Catherine’s current projects include relationships between war / the military and popular culture; the cultural politics of international events (including the Eurovision Song Contest); LGBTQ politics and identities since the late Cold War, including queer representation in media; and ‘race’ in the Yugoslav region. She has also researched interpreters / translators in peacekeeping.
Alessandro
Gallicchio is Professor
of contemporary art history at École supérieure des beaux-arts de Nîmes
and adjunct faculty member at TELEMMe (AMU-CNRS) in Aix-en-Provence/Marseille.
After he completed his PhD, he was a post-doctoral fellow at the Institut National
d’Histoire de l’Art and Centre Pompidou (Labex CAP) and worked on the relations
between art and urban space in contemporary Albania. Through an
interdisciplinary approach, engaging a dialogue between art history, cultural
geography, architectural history, and anthropology, he launched with Pierre
Sintès MonuMed, an art and social sciences project focused on the
new practices of artistic and architectural monumentalization. In 2020 he was
André Chastel fellow at the Villa Medici in Rome and in 2021 he is researcher in
residence at École Françaised’Athènes. As an independent curator, he
collaborates with international art centers and museums and he presented Rue
d’Alger exhibition in Manifesta 13 Marseille Les Parallèles du Sud
Biennial.
Zoltán Ginelliis a PhD Candidate in Geography at EötvösLoránd University. His research and teaching focuses on critical geography, historical and political geography, and the geographies of knowledge, but he also specializes in the history, sociology and philosophy of science, science communication, and science and technology studies. His forthcoming dissertation book is a transnational history of the “quantitative revolution” in Cold War geography, and his current research reinterprets colonial history and postcolonialist thought in Eastern Europe. Since 2015, he has been a part-time Research Assistant in the international research projects “1989 After 1989” and “Socialism Goes Global” at the University of Exeter. Zoltán is devoted to fighting social injustice, promoting progressive teaching and critical geography in Hungary, for which he runs two blogs, the Forum for Hungarian Critical Geographers (https://www.facebook.com/kritikaifoldrajz) and Critical Geographies (https://kritikaifoldrajz.hu). Whenever he can, Zoltán enjoys academic reading, blog writing, traveling, and art, while on gloomy evenings plays the blues on his prized guitar, an American Fender Stratocaster.
Olivier Givre, is anthropologist and Associate Professor at
the University Lumière-Lyon2 (France). He works mainly in the Balkans
(Bulgaria, Greece and other countries) on several fields: ritual and religious dynamics, memoryand
heritage processes, border and territory issues. His present research interests
concern ecological anthropology, sensory anthropology and research-creation. He
is the cofounder of the CREABALK – Creative Balkans network. https://univ-lyon2.academia.edu/OlivierGivre
Contact: olivier.givre1@univ-lyon2.fr
Danijela Majstorović (MA 2003, Ohio University; PhD 2006 University of Banja Luka) is a Professor of English Linguistics and Cultural Studies at the University of Banja Luka’s English department. She is also a Humboldt Experienced Research Fellow studying social protests and third-wave migrations in and from post-2015 Western Balkans at Justus Liebig University in Giessen, Germany. She was a visiting researcher at Lancaster University in 2006, a Fulbright fellow at UCLA in 2012-2013, a Canada Research Chair in Cultural Studies Postdoctoral Fellow at the University of Alberta in 2014 and a visiting researcher at Indiana University in 2016. Her research interests involve critical discourse analysis, critical theory, feminist theory, post- and decolonial theory, and post-Dayton Bosnia. She published over 25 journal articles, co-authored Youth Ethnic and National Identity in Bosnia and Herzegovina (Palgrave, 2013), authored Diskursiperiferije (Biblioteka XX vek, Belgrade) and Diskurs, moć i međunarodnazajednica (FF Banja Luka, 2007). She edited Living With Patriarchy: Discursive Construction of Gendered Subjects Across Cultures (John Benjamins, 2011), U okriljunacije (CKSP Banja Luka, 2011) and Kritičkekulturološkestudije u postjugoslovenskomprostoru (Banja Luka, 2012). Her new book Discourse and Affect in Post-socialist Bosnia and Herzegovina: Peripheral Selves is due to come for Palgrave in 2021.
Polina Manolova holds a PhD in East European Studies from the University of Birmingham, UK. She teaches under- and postgraduate courses in migration, borders and power asymmetries across Europe. Her research focuses on intra-EU migrations and pathways of incorporation of east European migrants in Germany. Furthermore, she is interested in exploring the spread of Western modernity and (self) Orientalisation narratives in postsocialist Europe. She is a member and co-founder of the Dialoguing Posts Network. Currently, she is based in the University of Tuebingen (Germany).
Ioannis Manos is Αssociate Professor in the Department of Balkan, Slavic
and Oriental Studies, at the University of Macedonia in Thessaloniki. He studied
History and Archaeology at the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki and Social
Anthropology at the Universities of Hamburg, Germany and Sussex in the UK. He
worked as a Full Time Visiting Research Fellow at the Sussex European
Institute, (Sussex University) holding a Marie Curie scholarship from the
European Union. He is a member of the editorial collective of the Teaching
Anthropology Journal (Royal Anthropological Institute) and co-convener of the
EASA-Teaching Anthropology Network. He is a founding member of the academic
network for Anthropology and the Balkans «Border Crossings», member of the
Advisory Board and co-editor of its publication series. His main research
interests focus on Southeast Europe and his publications include articles and co-edited
volumes on geopolitical borders and border regions, nationalism and identity
politics, anthropology of dance, migration and the methodology of teaching
anthropology.
Eleni Sideri, holds a PhD in social anthropology from SOAS/University of London. She completed three master degrees in Social Anthropology, Near and Middle Eastern studies (SOAS) and sociolinguistics (AUTH). She holds also a degree in Film Studies (AUTH). She did fieldwork in the Caucasus, in Bosnia-Herzegovina and in Greece. Her academic interests include diasporas, transnational migrations, mobilities, tourism and post-conflict urban development, language and sociolinguistics, post-socialist societies and cinemas, film and TV narratives, anthropology of media, experimental ethnographic writing, digital technologies. She co-edited the volume Religions and Migrations in the Black Sea (2017) Macmillan/Palgrave.
Pierre Sintès is Associate Professor of Cultural and Social Geography at Aix- Marseille University, France. His research is about the social and political transformations related to migration, diaspora and mobility in Greece and other Balkan’s countries. He focuses more particularly on discourses of identification, and social and ethnic affiliations and relationships between identity and space. His recent publications (in English) include Chasing the Past: Geopolitics of Memory on the Margins of Modern Greece (Liverpool University Press, 2020), Social Practices and Local Configurations in the Balkans (European University of Tirana Press, 2013) and Borders, Mobilities and Migrations. Perspectives from the Mediterranean, 19–21st Century (Peter Lang, 2011).He is the cofounder of the CREABALK – Creative Balkans network.
Fotini Tsibiridou is Professor of Social Anthropology at the Department of Balkan, Slavic and Oriental Studies at the University of Macedonia and acting Director of the Laboratory for the Study of Culture, Borders and Gender. She has done fieldwork in a former refugee village and among the Pomaks in Greek Thrace, in Macedonian and Peloponnese villages and the Sultanate of Oman. She has also researched nationalism and multiculturalist discourses and practices in Greek Thrace, as well as gender, citizenship and creative counter publics in Istanbul. Currently (since 2018) she is researching two topics: post-Ottoman religiosity and gendered subjectivity in the frame of post-colonial critique (Balkans, Turkey, the Middle East), and feminist and other decolonizing methodologies deployed in creative protests and resistance practices in Mediterranean cities in the way to/of cosmopolitics. She is the cofounder of the CREABALK – Creative Balkans network.
The Department of Balkan Slavic and Oriental Studies, the “History of Eastern and Southeastern Europe LAB” and the “Culture-Borders-Gender /LAB” co-organize a conference entitled “2020 an extraordinary year in pandemic times: Academic experiences and research practices from the Balkans“, which will take place online on the zoom platform on 23rd and 24th of January 2021. The link of the conference will be announced on Friday 22/1/2021 The conference is open to the public. To register, enter your details on the platform: https://forms.gle/BYgwBWDFTdM7QpU6A
How are ethnographic encounters with alterity mediated and transformed by multimedia
technologies? Drawing on the insights and questions raised by both material culture studies
and the ontological turn, we aim to facilitate a global conversation on the concepts, forms
and mediums through which knowledge is produced and shared. This conference is hosted
by UCL Multimedia Anthropology Lab, an interdisciplinary research network aimed at
developing innovative methods for anthropological practice.
CONFERENCE THEME: KNOWLEDGE OTHERWISE
Anthropological encounters with others have led us to question ideas previously taken as
given. Concepts of family, society, culture, nature, and what it means to be human have all
been subject to revision. When these critiques are directed towards knowledge itself, the
different ideas people have about what knowledge is and how it is shared have led us to
question the theories and practices through which we seek to know. Proponents of the
ontological turn (Holbraad & Pedersen 2017) have developed these ideas to call for an
anthropological project that is radically experimental, drawing on ethnographic encounters
with alterity to critically interrogate the analytical concepts that inform our research.
At the same time, material culture studies has pointed towards the important role of materials
in the articulation of human knowledge. The materials through which ethnographic
encounters are translated into knowledge – as text, image, sound, performance, simulated
sensory immersion, etc – shape the ways in which these encounters are experienced by
others, and the conceptual affordances they present. We examine how ethnographic
encounters with alterity can disrupt not only the conceptual frameworks of anthropology, but
also the material practices through which knowledge is produced and communicated, and
explore how anthropological knowledge can be both thought and made otherwise.
These questions are especially pertinent in the context of a global pandemic, which has
changed the ways we encounter and communicate with others, disrupting diverse forms of
knowing and doing. In parallel to this conference, UCL MAL has initiated a partnership with
the Kuñangue Aty Guasu, an annual meeting of Guarani & Kaiowá indigenous women in
Brazil, which this year will take place online. The translation of this event into an online format
allows us to reflect on the parallels between the knowledge practices of indigenous
communities and those of anthropologists, and invites us to consider each as a variant
(Maniglier 2016) of the other. If we consider the indigenous meeting as an Other kind of
conference, and the conference as an Other kind of indigenous meeting, what can we learn
about conferences, indigenous meetings, and knowledge itself?
This conference seeks to explore how knowledge can be cast otherwise, in concept,
method, and form. We consider how different concepts of knowledge entail different forms
of practice, and how different materials and techniques enable different conceptual
encounters. What are the conceptual affordances of multimedia encounters with alterity?
What is the relation between sensory experience and conceptual movement? Can
encounters with alterity be simulated in VR? Can we do theory through film or sound? How
can AI traverse multiple ontologies, and what does that mean for concepts? How can
websites, social media, and other digital platforms disseminate research findings? Can
research be presented as performance? How can an exhibition be posed as an experiment?
What is the concept of the concept?
If we are to seriously question the concepts and methods through which we produce
knowledge, then our commitment to being radically experimental must go beyond a critique
of analytical tools and extend to a thorough interrogation of the methods and mediums
through which research is produced and presented.
SUBMISSION GUIDELINES
UCL MAL invites contributions from academics and practitioners across disciplines who
engage with these questions, and experiment with innovative approaches to conducting and
presenting research. We welcome submissions in any format (accompanied by a written
abstract) and encourage contributors to interpret our theme as broadly as possible. We are
particularly interested in contributions which explore the following topics/methods:
VR & 360 VIDEO | IMMERSIVE ENVIRONMENTS | SONIC ETHNOGRAPHY | NET ART |
PERFORMANCE | ETHNOGRAPHIC FILM | EXHIBITION AS RESEARCH | PROJECTION
MAPPING | SCULPTURE | MULTISENSORY MEDIA | INTERACTIVE INSTALLATION |
PHOTOGRAMMETRY | AI & MACHINE LEARNING | DIGITAL ANTHROPOLOGY | & MORE
Please submit abstracts of no more than 300 words, and any multimedia materials that are
relevant to your work, by 23:59 GMT on Wednesday the 2nd of December 2020. Please
use the following submission link: www.uclmal.com/conferences
CONFERENCE PROGRAMME & KEYNOTE SPEAKERS The conference will take place online on the 12th, 13th & 14th of January 2021, and will be accompanied by an online exhibition of multimedia works. Each day will begin with keynote contributions from academics and practitioners whose theory and practice invite us to think otherwise, followed by thematic panels where experimental research approaches and their implications for theory will be debated in more depth. The following keynote speakers have been confirmed so far:
Ludovic Coupaye | Lecturer in Anthropology | UCL Haidy Geismar | Professor of Anthropology | UCL Jaqueline Aranduhá | Guarani & Kaiowá Indigenous Leader
UCL MULTIMEDIA ANTHROPOLOGY LAB UCL MALis an interdisciplinary research network that explores innovative methods for conducting and presenting ethnographic research. We have organised several seminar series and exhibitions at UCL and have presented work and ideas at Somerset House, Modern Art Oxford, and the Tate Modern. Founded in 2017 by doctoral research students at UCL Anthropology, today MAL is composed of over 50 members around the world, with representatives from anthropology, art, computer science, sound studies, film, and human rights. MAL has been generously supported by UCL Anthropology, the Institute of Advanced Studies, UCL Grand Challenges, and the British Museum.
If you would like to learn more about MAL or our activities please visit our website at www.uclmal.com or contact us directly at info@uclmal.com.
The image above depicts an anthropologist and research assistant sanitising Covid supplies before delivering them to Guarani & Kaiowá indigenous communities in Brazil. The scene, made possible by the presence of a 360 camera, illustrates the hyper-awareness of anthropological encounters in a Covid context and invites us to reflect on the ways in which encounters are mediated – whether by recording technologies, digital tools for remote communication or by PPE.